With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, many artists and creative professionals are growing concerned. Just as the Industrial Revolution automated manual labor, AI now seems to be taking over intellectual and artistic work.
From writing and research to art and learning, it’s quite agonizing to watch AI make even our minds complacent.
Sure, AI offers the benefits of speed and efficiency.
But if we start accepting vague reproductions of a lifetime’s work, it raises serious concerns about how we express perspectives.
The key difference between human-made and AI-generated art lies in emotion. Every word, brushstroke, and musical note carries the weight of personal experience, cultural shifts, and societal narratives. Art isn’t just about aesthetics—it’s about storytelling, struggle, and human connection.
AI can be a useful tool, but it shouldn’t replace human artistry. It lacks the ability to feel, dream, or rebel—qualities that define great art. Instead of letting AI take over, we should use it to support and enhance creativity, ensuring that human expression remains irreplaceable.
You are so right about this. Art serves as a symbol of living for many people. Having to think that art is so easily created with just a few prompts is saddening when there are real people who basically devote their entire lives to art.
ReplyDelete